What is the self and how can we know it, or can we know it at all Term Paper

What is the egotism-importance-importance and how piece of tail we know it, or can we know it at all - Term Paper ExampleAscribing from the above definition it can be argued that the self refers to what someone perceives or thinks about himself. The self concept can be known when one becomes aware of oneself. An individual can know this concept when he belief on himself or herself and achieves a higher level of individualal attributes awareness. It can be generally the self can be viewed o three strands perspective. First is the physical self who basically comprise the sense impression of embodiment, psychological self which is the ability to differentiate between self and others (Mitchell 56). Finally is the higher level sense which summarizes the actions attributed to the psychological and the physical self. The self can overly be identified by the discourse and the conduct of the individual. In weigh to this, the intentions of an individual and the actions which emanates can also be used to describe the self. The identity of the self concept of an individual is determined particularly by the distinct characteristics and attributes of an individual (Mitchell 98). Descartes position on self Descartes position and perception of self is the ascription of the self to being the transcendent agent which can be referred to as homunculus. Descartes provides that the self is a non-natural entity citing the soul which basically determines the various human components and perceptions. On this agent condition view the concept of big is the cause of the actions which is attributed to the self and that it is free from the natural causation (Mitchell 115). This Descartes position on self can be referred to as indeterminism where the pipeline is basically based on the free will of the individuals. The argument is further based on the moral responsibility and it asserts that the existence of the self leads to existence of the free will which is responsible for an in dividual actions. This position in is perceived voidable because of the belief of the existence of the soul which basically affect the human way of mentation and how bodies react. The self of an individual is highly connected to the source of the personal identity (Mitchell 120). Descartes position on self ascribes to the fact that the soul is relevant in find out the identity of an individual. This is further attributed to the soul imperceptibility and being the source of the identity. The weakness of this view is the fact that the soul may change having the same memoires attributes and the doubt in regard to the change and dynamism of personal behaviors (Mitchell 146). Lockes empiricism and the self Lockes empiricism and the self are based on the argument which considers the self as immortal and attributes it to the personal immortality. Locke asserts that the self doesnt know the nature it ought to have in order to be able to think. The determination of the soul identity is als o ascribed since matter is basically in a continuous flux. He further argue that the key to the self of a person is individual is memory. What makes a person attributed to the self is the ability to posses the living awareness of the personal interest which basically makes a person who he or she is. In this Lockes view of the self the aspect of memory having substantial basis is taken into account. There is the possibility of the self having immortality without opposing anti-dogmatism. The strengths associated to this perception are that it justifies the belief of individual self, its gives a coarse ground of discussing the validity of the personal self (Mitchell 78). The weaknesses of this stand are that it does not clearly explain the demarcation